Russia - Corporate/M&A: Lawyers Based Abroad (Expertise Based Abroad) Lawyers & Law Firms - Europe - Chambers and Partners
Chambers & Partners has detected the use of an ad blocker.
We make use of tailor-made ads to enhance your experience of our website.
Please 'whitelist' http://www.chambersandpartners.com.
Close
Europe Guide

Corporate/M&A: Lawyers Based Abroad (Expertise Based Abroad) — Russia

We do not rank firms for this territory and specialism but we rank individuals. 此地区和专业领域只限于律师排名,不设律所排名。

Overview

Russia continues to reform its legislation by reducing the imperative tone of its regulations and putting emphasis on enhancing the protection of business investments. We hope that this reform will have a positive impact on Russian business as a whole and M&A transactions in particular.

In recent years, Russia has been gradually simplifying the administrative regulation of business. Some of the most recent simplifications included a reduction in the time required for registering a new legal entity to up to three business days as well as changes to the rules and procedures relating to transferring a participation interest in a limited liability company. In response to demand from business, the state has also strengthened some legal instruments whose enforceability was very limited before. Good examples are the use of waivers, options, corporate guarantees and transaction break-up payoffs. Another change relates to permitting shareholders of joint-stock companies to make unremunerated contributions to the companies’ assets.

To enhance the protection of shareholders, Russia has also amended rules relating to corporate approvals required for major transactions and interested party transactions. The amendments provide for a more detailed and flexible regulatory regime which addresses a number of practical issues. In order to mitigate the risks of groundless challenges to such transactions, the new regulation limits the potential claimants eligible to launch such a challenge, to shareholders holding at least 1% of the votes. Also, now the challenging party does not need to prove any damage; the fact that an approval for a transaction is absent constitutes grounds for invalidation.

Creating a more comfortable environment is not limited only to substantive law; procedural law regulations are also being improved. For example, a new law on arbitration has been adopted that contains a number of very important innovations; in particular, the arbitrability of certain corporate disputes is acknowledged. Also, to ensure consistency in applying the new legal instruments and concepts as well as to promote the uniform interpretation of the law, the higher courts, while developing case law practice, now issue guidelines on using and interpreting the new legal instruments for further use by lawyers and lower courts.

Russian versus international law

The lack of flexibility and the excessively imperative tone of the Russian legal system has often made it more difficult for investors to use some of the institutions and legal instruments that are available in other jurisdictions. This was a source of criticism. It was also a reason why investors, and some Russian companies, tried to move to foreign jurisdictions, have their contracts regulated by foreign law and have their disputes resolved by non-Russian courts.

However, using foreign law and foreign arbitral tribunals (or foreign state courts) is not always justified, as such disputes are expensive and involve lengthy procedures in the dispute resolution stage itself and during the decision enforcement process.

To address this, Russia has launched a reform of civil legislation and, as a result, extensive amendments are being made to the Russian Civil Code and a number of other laws. The focus of the changes has been the introduction of legal mechanisms and tools that offer similar protection to Russian law deals as those structured under foreign law. For example, representations and indemnities were introduced. Additionally, the approach to interpreting conditions precedent was changed; pre-contractual negotiations are now regulated and a mechanism of payment by escrow has been introduced. The new legal instruments are not identical but are fairly similar to foreign legal provisions. Despite the fact that such legal instruments are fairly new, the number of Russian law transactions has already been growing.

New legal instruments available under Russian law

Below, we briefly describe key innovative legal instruments that can be used in M&A transactions under Russian law.

Representations

Among recent amendments to the Civil Code, the equivalent of representations and warranties was introduced, defined as ‘representations as to circumstances’. However, in Russian law representations, no distinction is made between representations and warranties. According to the Civil Code, breaching representations evokes an obligation to compensate a counterparty for losses or pay a penalty. Moreover, the counterparty may repudiate the contract if there is a breach of representations that is significant to the counterparty. As a general rule, liability applies irrespective of fault, i.e. irrespective of whether the party knew that such representations were false.

Indemnities

Before the reform, Russian law did not recognise the concept of indemnity, which is widely used in international M&A transactions. Now Russian law allows the parties to establish in a contract that one party has an obligation to the other party for the other party's property loss which arises as a consequence of specified circumstances, but is not connected to any breach of obligations. If a contract is treated as invalid or not having been concluded, this does not terminate an indemnity obligation.

Conditions precedent

A condition precedent is an event or state of affairs that is required before a transaction is completed. If such conditions are not met, the transaction is terminated. Previously, the concept of condition precedent had a limited effect in Russian law; in particular, such conditions can not depend on the will of the parties. Therefore, a condition to obtain a consent of the board of directors or of a general meeting of shareholders as a condition precedent was unenforceable in practice. Now, the law directly provides that the parties may stipulate that obligations are to be met by way of certain actions being performed or not performed, or if circumstances occur that are fully dependent on the will of the parties.

Bad-faith negotiations

The negotiation process is now regulated by law. In particular, the law apportions the costs of negotiations in the event a party enters into negotiations without an intent to conclude a contract. Providing false information or terminating negotiations without reasonable grounds is now treated as bad-faith behaviour. The party negotiating in bad faith must reimburse the losses caused by its behaviour. What is especially noteworthy is the obligation established by the law not to disclose and not to use confidential information received during negotiations in an improper manner for one’s own purposes. Also, the law stipulates that losses must be reimbursed if this obligation is violated.

Escrow account contract

The mechanism of payment by escrow is also widely used in international M&A transactions. The main purpose is to ensure that neither party can, at the same time, hold shares and the money transferred as payment for shares. The new escrow account mechanisms introduced into Russian law will ensure flexibility when determining the terms and conditions of settlements, including with regard to M&A transactions.

READ MORE

READ LESS

Band 1

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP

From the Chambers Europe guide

The firm's London managing partner Pranav Trivedi has been called "possibly the most senior Russia expert operating out of London right now." He lends his expertise to significant outbound M&A transactions in Europe. Clients applaud his pragmatic and solution-oriented approach: "He has great flair and finds innovative answers that no-one else would think of."

^ Return to Top

Band 2

Dechert LLP

From the Chambers Europe guide

US-qualified practice head and managing partner Laura Brank splits her time between London, Washington and Moscow. Sources say she gives "pragmatic, business-oriented and astute advice."

^ Return to Top

Band 2

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

From the Chambers Europe guide

Qualified to practise in the US, UK and Russia, Olga Sirodoeva is based in Washington. She assists international and domestic clients involved in inbound and outbound transactions. She focuses on large-scale M&A, particularly in relation to real estate projects.

^ Return to Top

Band 3

White & Case LLP

From the Chambers Europe guide

London-based David Crook assists with the English law aspects of complex transactions. He focuses on cross-border transactions in the energy sector. He is considered a valuable asset in international transactions, with one source saying: "We would count on him if required to deal with really complex English law questions."

^ Return to Top

Band 3

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP

From the Chambers Europe guide

London-based, US-qualified Hilary Foulkes is an international transactional lawyer with a notable track record in Russian deals. He remains a key contact for Western clients with interests in the region, particularly in joint venture projects and cross-border transactions.

^ Return to Top

Band 3

Clifford Chance LLP

From the Chambers Europe guide

UK-qualified David Griston focuses his practice on the energy sector, where he has extensive experience working on cross-border projects. He is based in Amsterdam.

^ Return to Top

Band 3

Clifford Chance LLP

From the Chambers Europe guide

London-based Nicholas Rees acts on major cross-border M&A deals involving significant Russian assets. A source says he is "to the point, business-oriented and understands our concerns."

^ Return to Top

Band 3

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP

From the Chambers Europe guide

Munich-based Michael Schwartz capitalises on decades of experience of working in Moscow. He remains a key contact for German clients involved in cross-border transactions and joint ventures.

^ Return to Top

Band 4

White & Case

From the Chambers Europe guide

Based in Düsseldorf, Hermann Schmitt continues to have a strong Russia-focused practice. Principally acting for German clients with Russian interests, he acts for major industrial and energy companies. He was an instrumental member of the team acting for Wintershall in its share-swap deal with Gazprom.

^ Return to Top

Band 4

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld

From the Chambers Europe guide

Daniel Walsh is a US-qualified lawyer based in London. He focuses on the Russian TMT sphere, assisting with cross-border transactions and joint ventures.

^ Return to Top

Band 4

Herbert Smith Freehills

From the Chambers Europe guide

UK-qualified and London-based Tomasz Wozniak remains an active figure in Russian transactions. Described as "very robust in negotiations and very good at putting forward convincing arguments" by sources, he recently represented Getin in its sale of Carcade to Bin Group.

^ Return to Top