THE SET This elite civil liberties set is a true force to be reckoned with in the human rights arena, being praised for its commitment and dedication to the sector. It has more quality members both at junior and senior level than most other sets, and a handful of these could be described as "superstars in the field." Barristers here have appeared in many of the most novel and high-profile cases in the field, including the Binyam Mohammed litigation, and HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon), the Supreme Court ruling on the rights of gay asylum seekers.
SILKS Michael Fordham QC is "at the pinnacle of the profession" and universally considered to be a star. "He ensures arguments are carefully crafted and is always succinct in his addresses," say sources. "His clarity of thought allows him to produce exemplary addresses that hold the attention of Supreme Court judges. He guides the Bench through some exceedingly complex arguments relating to the right to liberty and access to justice." Fellow star of the Public Law Bar David Pannick QC is "outstanding in all areas" and "consistently on the ball." Recent notable cases for him include the challenge by Max Mosley in the ECHR to English privacy law. Pannick also represented the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis in the Supreme Court in a case looking at whether the retention of DNA samples of persons arrested but not prosecuted constitutes a breach of their human rights. Also riding extremely high, Dinah Rose QC has a broad practice, and acts for both claimants and the government. Constantly in the news, she makes telling and extremely well-received contributions in many of the highlight cases of the day. By way of example, she acted in the challenge to the ban on selling cigarettes through vending machines and handled the case of Smith, which determined the applicability of the Human Rights Act to soldiers serving in Iraq.
First Treasury counsel James Eadie QC appears in major judicial reviews and public law cases. He is "exceptional, has incredible intellect and always exerts great control over the facts in a case." Sources further praise his polite court manner. Timothy Otty QC is another jewel in the set's crown. His recent work has had a more international flavour, as illustrated by his involvement in a constitutional issue relating to the removal of a Grand Court judge of the Cayman Islands from office on the grounds of inability to perform that office/misbehaviour. He also handled a Special Immigration Appeals Commission case on the lawfulness of a deportation. Fellow leading public law silk John Howell QC is "able to deal with huge amounts of information quickly and incisively," much to the delight of instructing solicitors. They praise his "ability to think laterally and come up with innovative arguments," and further note that he is an authority on issues relating to Article 6 of the ECHR. Monica Carss-Frisk QC has a "first-class mind" and is noted for her "clarity of expression" in court. Also excellent on the paperwork, she was recently instructed in the Hong Kong Court of First Instance by the Department of Justice in a unique human rights-based challenge to the rights of transgender people to marry. Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC remains one of the first names out of the hat for solicitors who require a practitioner with a wealth of human rights law expertise. His knowledge of the law is such that he took a major role in the promotion of the Equality Bill, which subsequently came into force as the Equality Act 2010. Pushpinder Saini QC is singled out for his expert knowledge of EU law, which he demonstrated in Al Shanfari, a successful challenge to EU asset-freezing measures. He also acted in the extremely important case of Kadi, representing Mr Kadi, who succeeded in establishing the invalidity of EU legislation implementing the sanctions adopted post-9/11 in relation to those accused of supporting terrorism and Al-Qaeda. Javan Herberg QC recently took silk to the delight of many. Recent notable work for him includes the judicial review challenge to compensation provisions arising out of the nationalisation of Northern Rock. He has also been acting for the Secretary of State defending a claim involving right-to-liberty issues brought by a prisoner under Article 5 of the ECHR.
JUNIORS The set's strength at silk level is matched by its impressive range of juniors. Thomas de la Mare is a first-choice junior for many and is held in high regard by all. There is widespread agreement that his elevation to silk is but a short time away. Recently, he appeared with Pannick in a judicial review challenge to the government’s decision to introduce a ban on the display of tobacco products. Shaheed Fatima comes recommended for her expertise in a broad range of civil liberties issues, many of which have an international angle. She recently appeared in Ahmed, a case concerning the compatibility of the asset freezing of suspected terrorists with civil liberties law. Also popular is Tom Hickman, who impresses sources with his "ability to grasp new areas of law quickly" and his "willingness to team up with the solicitor rather than just let the solicitor instruct him." He has strength in immigration, terrorism and asylum and national security cases.
Ben Jaffey has a "brilliant, comprehensive and imaginative legal mind." This "witty and charming" advocate acted alongside many of the set in the Binyam Mohamed litigation and acted in a judicial review of the government's refusal to disclose information about torture and ill-treatment in Guantanamo Bay. Many believe that he is another who deserves to take silk very soon. Naina Patel has handled a number of cases concerning detention in Guantanamo Bay, Iraq and Afghanistan. She recently took a sabbatical from chambers, which ended in June 2011, in order to work as senior justice adviser to the provincial reconstruction team in Helmand, Afghanistan. This committed performer is admired for her "bravery and willingness to tackle matters head on." David Pievsky acts for and against public law bodies and handles a wide range of civil liberties issues, including asylum, human rights, prison law and regulatory matters. He has recently been acting for the police in judicial review claims brought by protestors who allege breaches of human rights at G20 protests. Kate Gallafent has an "aura of calmness" that impresses interviewees, who further add that "she is superb in her ability to manage the client's expectations and to come across in a composed and controlled manner at all times." She recently successfully defended a challenge to Ofcom concerning the client's right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the ECHR. Iain Steele is said to be "stunningly good for one of his level of call." As with Pievsky, he had a role in the judicial review of the policing of the 'Climate Camp' protest during the G20 meeting in London in 2009. He also appeared with Rose in the challenge to the ban on selling cigarettes through vending machines.